- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Rose: "Re: [VRUG] true minimum requirements - 3.01"
- Previous message: Jim Green: "Re: [VRUG] true minimum requirements - 3.01"
- In reply to: L.C.Jackson@@psd.maff.gov.uk: "Re: slow "SendSystemKeys" (was BringUp "Explorer" probs)"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Epstein: "Re: [VRUG] where is Nat. 3.0 ?"
many chips and motherboards. The K6-2/300 usually doesn't equal the P-II
300 (unless you are overclocking it). Depends on which benchmark you run.
Tom has a new article on the K6-2 you might be interested in reading.
-----------------------------------
At 01:06 AM 8/11/98 -0700, Oleg Kiselev wrote:
>one of local stores was advertizing a k6-2/300 chip and motherboard for
>under $300. the ad claimed performance within a few % of intel's pII/400.
>does anyone have experience running voice recognition on this platform?
>seems very inexpensive (after the last price drop, pII/400 is over $550
>for the chip alone)...
- Next message: Rose: "Re: [VRUG] true minimum requirements - 3.01"
- Previous message: Jim Green: "Re: [VRUG] true minimum requirements - 3.01"
- In reply to: L.C.Jackson@@psd.maff.gov.uk: "Re: slow "SendSystemKeys" (was BringUp "Explorer" probs)"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Epstein: "Re: [VRUG] where is Nat. 3.0 ?"
 |  |