- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Robert Halpern: "Re: Sound cards - PCI vs. ISA"
- Previous message: Jim Green: "Re: Sound cards - PCI vs. ISA"
- In reply to: L.C.Jackson@@psd.maff.gov.uk: "Headset tip (was Mic Conundrum, New To List)"
- Next in thread: Dr. Sarah M. Young: "Re: Is it just me?"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Su,
My experience has been the following, WP8 and NS perfect. Stedmans El med
speller should be chained onto the WP8 regular speller. I only use the
dictionary very infrequently, about once a month, and then shut it down after
to save memory. If you use NS 2.02 or 3 why use an abb expander? The
speller and abb expander do not make sense when using NS, one does not need
it.
The expander - if its "dictionary" is full, it will take up a lot of memory
anyway. I would use a minimum of a 266 P II. I believe a 200 will be too
slow
with NS 3 even with 128 megs of memory with the best match.
Regards,
G
At 07:44 PM 8/3/1998 -0500, Su wrote:
>
> I'm just getting started with NatSpeak and would like to use it within WP
> 8.0. I'd like to know if it is possible to simultaneously run the following:
>
> WP 8.0
> NatSpeak 3.0
> Stedman's Electronic Medical Speller
> Stedman's Electronic Medical Dictionary
> Abbreviate (abbreviation expander)
>
> If not, how about just the first two? Also is this something a 200 MHz PC
> with 128 RAM can handle with sufficient speed for MT work?
--=====================_30744205==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Su,
My experience has been the following, WP8 and NS perfect. Stedmans
El med speller should be chained onto the WP8 regular speller. I
only use the dictionary very infrequently, about once a month, and then
shut it down after to save memory. If you use NS 2.02 or 3
why use an abb expander? The speller and abb expander do not
make sense when using NS, one does not need it. The expander - if its
"dictionary" is full, it will take up a lot of memory
anyway. I would use a minimum of a 266 P II. I believe a 200
will be too slow with NS 3 even with 128 megs of memory with the best
match.
Regards,
G
At 07:44 PM 8/3/1998 -0500, Su wrote:
I'm just getting started
with NatSpeak and would like to use it within WP 8.0. I'd like to know if
it is possible to simultaneously run the following:
WP 8.0
NatSpeak 3.0
Stedman's Electronic Medical Speller
Stedman's Electronic Medical Dictionary
Abbreviate (abbreviation expander)
If not, how about just the first two? Also is this something a 200 MHz PC
with 128 RAM can handle with sufficient speed for MT work?
--=====================_30744205==_.ALT--
- Next message: Robert Halpern: "Re: Sound cards - PCI vs. ISA"
- Previous message: Jim Green: "Re: Sound cards - PCI vs. ISA"
- In reply to: L.C.Jackson@@psd.maff.gov.uk: "Headset tip (was Mic Conundrum, New To List)"
- Next in thread: Dr. Sarah M. Young: "Re: Is it just me?"
 |  |