Judy Evans wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Jeff Foley wrote:
>
> > the tongue nicer than some of the alternatives. Though you'd think
> > "drag-o" would give us more brand recognition, I equate it to saying "that
> > movie's a Waterworld" :-)
>
> "Drag-o-_naut_"?!
>
> -- sure sounds good
>
> ("Speako"? -- don't you mean "heardo" or "hearo" -- "Dragon Naturally
> Speaking Makes Hearos of You", _ad_:
>
> that will be $250,000 or a quick UK Nat 3 upgrade....)
>
> > sort of carrier wave for the antenna and creates the hum. (You can make
> > the hum more or less audible by moving the cord around, sometimes even get
> > more noise by putting it over a monitor, etc.)
>
> You remind me of my radio "antenna", which is a silly thing like
> a mike cord and behaves a bit like that.
>
> > --Jeff, trying desperately to remember his electromagnetic courses having
> > forsaken his engineering degree for the Dark Side (marketing)
>
> :)
>
> > (insert usual disclaimers about Jeff trying to be a helpful generic speech
> > recognition user rather than a representive of Dragon Systems)
>
> So we can say Drag-o? ;-)
>
> -- How's the new office/office-space/cupboard?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Judy Evans jae2@@york.ac.uk
> Typing by Dragon Systems Software.................Opinions mine
![]() |