Susan Fulton wrote:
>
> >From what I've seen on so-called natural language commands so far, they
> appear to be just vastly larger groups of commands from which one can draw,
> perhaps more flexible from the outset but not really natural. Is this
> assessment correct? If so, in my opinion natural language commands are not
> easy to use but harder than predefined commands that one can look up
> easily. What I really want to know, though, is whether natural language
> commands are just something that works in Microsoft Word? And if so, why is
> that? Is it somehow connected to Active Accessibility? Can someone explain
> why natural language commands are available in word and not in the speech
> program's native editor, such as IBM's SpeakPad and NaturallySpeaking text
> editor?
> As for Active Accessibility, is this preventing menu accessibility in the
> NaturallySpeaking interface with Microsoft Word? What is Active
> Accessibility anyway?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----SF/ using speech recognition software/forgive odd typos
![]() |