- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Ken Martin: "Re: Microsoft Voice"
- Previous message: Andrea Fuller: "Re: DD under Linux"
- In reply to: Adam Janin: "Re: L & H Voice Express / NaturallySpeaking Upgrade"
was long. Have not had opportunity to do much checking on accuracy, but at
first words after enrollment (dictation in noisy environment, enrollment in
quiet environment) the accuracy was not too good. The tight integration
with Word makes it appealing, if the accuracy is good. Just don't know yet.
At 09:33 AM 6/4/98 -0700, Adam Janin wrote:
>At 02:28 PM 6/4/98 +0200, you wrote:
>>I'm really surprised that I haven't heard any mention of L & H Voice
>>Express on this list....
>
>>The recognition of continuous speech seem to be roughly as good as
>>NaturallySpeaking, given the very brief demo I saw. The formatting of
>>text within Microsoft Word was impressive. The commands given seemed to
>>be totally unstructured (e.g." move this paragraph to the end of the
>>document and make it red").
>
>I saw a demo in January. It is NOT unstructured, it just has a lot of
>commands with a lot of alternatives. At the time, it was only for
>command-and-control of Word. It was not a dictation product. Nevertheless,
>it was very impressive. I could well imagine using NatSpeak to create the
>text, then Voice Express to edit it.
>
> Adam Janin
> janin@@cs.berkeley.edu
>
>
>
- Next message: Ken Martin: "Re: Microsoft Voice"
- Previous message: Andrea Fuller: "Re: DD under Linux"
- In reply to: Adam Janin: "Re: L & H Voice Express / NaturallySpeaking Upgrade"
 |  |