I would rather keep the list general rather than with specialized
subsections.
Holland
Eric Fishman wrote:
>
> Dear Voice-users,
>
> I had been speaking with Enrique earlier today about some changes /
> improvements to the voice-users email list.
>
> As a general principal, I feel comfortable saying that we will be happy to
> comply with any reasonable request that the majority of participants would
> prefer. This relates to list identification, as well as other issues.
>
> One specific item that we had been discussing was the possibility of adding
> any / all of the following potential additional mailing lists such as:
>
> voice-users-l for legal users
> voice-users-m for medical users
> voice-users-p for programmers,
> voice-users-h for hardware issues
> voice-users-d for Dragon
> voice-users-l for L&H
> voice-users-i for IBM
> etc.
>
> Please feel free at any time to recommend any improvements. Any constructive
> input is helpful in allowing us to develop this resource to best suit its
> users.
>
> Yours,
> eric
> --
> Eric Fishman, M.D.
> Pres., 21st Century Eloquence
> http://www.voicerecognition.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman@@arborius.net>
> To: Voice Users <voice-users@@voicerecognition.com>
> Date: Tuesday, May 12, 1998 2:13 PM
> Subject: List identification
>
> >I find it extremely convenient to have mailing lists identify themselves
> >by placing some identifier in the subject of every post. For voice-users,
> >this might have made the subject of this post look something like
> > [voice-users] List identification
> >Would anyone be interested in asking for such a change to this list? Helps
> >with filtering, doing a quick scan of your incoming messages, stuff like
> >that. Let me know!
> >
> >---
> >Jessica Perry Hekman * http://www.arborius.net/~jphekman/
> >Composed with DragonDictate
> >
> >
> >
![]() |