Also, I suspect that having the list's archive on a Web page is one
thing that makes us very vulnerable to automated email address
harvesters. Could be archive be password protected? It doesn't have
to be a secret password, in fact, you could probably put it right out
in the open on the page with the link to the archive, just as long as
it kept out harvesters.
>>>>> "EP" == Enrique Padilla <wwwmaster@@voicerecognition.com> writes:
EP> Greetings all !
EP> OK, lets talk about Jenny !
EP> The only way I can stop spam from coming into the list (if they are using
EP> voice-users@@voicerecognition.com) is to make the list ONLY accept messages
EP> from s ubscribed users (notice the space so that this message doesn't get
EP> rejected by the listserv).
EP> However, I did this a few weeks ago and I received anywhere from 20-30
EP> messages that did not go through to the list. This includes anyone who has
EP> had a variation for their email address, or anyone in the voice-users-digest
EP> which include many active members that do not like to receive 10 - 30
EP> messages daily.
EP> Unfortunately, there is no way around it. However, if you would like to try
EP> the 'members can post only' routine for a few weeks to see how it goes, that
EP> is ok by me. However, I am unable to re-post every message that is rejected
EP> by the listserv program. Maybe with a less active list, but this list
EP> posts over 300 messages per week.
EP> I do have 1 or 2 suggestions. As someone mentioned earlier, if you can use
EP> some type of filtering program to filter things like (You've Won, or Bulk
EP> Email or xxx or adults only or This is not mlm or any one of the average
EP> emails, you will notice a pattern in these spam mails and can filter most of
EP> them out. Email programs capable of this are Netscape Mail, MS Outlook 97
EP> (Outlook 98 has a special facility for spam mails), Calypso, Eudora, and
EP> many others.
EP> Well, lets take a vote.
EP> -Enrique
![]() |