- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: CHRISTOPHER D MONTESI: "Re: subscribe"
- Previous message: Patrick Henebry: "Re: error message in NS"
- Maybe in reply to: Mike Baehr: "error message in NS"
There are instances where NaturallySpeaking Deluxe Edition version 2.02 will
encounter problems without the 990KB version of mfc42.dll.
Asked for your comments about a full installation of Microsoft Office 97
causing serious problems with your system I can fully relate. In my case it
wasn't Office 97 but rather Internet Explorer 4.0; I have had enough
problems with installation of Microsoft products in the past that I now make
a habit of doing a complete backup of my system before installing anything
for Microsoft.
Patrick
-----Original Message-----
From: Rose <edrose19@@idt.net>
To: David Rollo <dr@@cardiotips.com>
Cc: voice-users@@voicerecognition.com <voice-users@voicerecognition.com>
Date: Monday, March 23, 1998 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: error message in NS
>I believe that mfc42.dll was only an issue with Nat Personal, version
>1.0. With Nat Deluxe, version 2.02, I have tried the 919k one, the
>920k, one and the one that version 1.0 likes (990k) and it doesn't seem
>to matter to Nat. However, it is interesting to note that if you rename
>mfc42.dll to mfc42.old and do an uninstall/reinstall of Nat version
>2.02, it still loads the 990k one. David, did you load Office 97 last?
>Do you have Outlook, Exchange and FindFast enabled? (this is a wild
>guess but a full install of Office 97 screwed up my whole system
>resulting in about 2 solid days work to get everything working happily
>together again)
>Rose
>"who would not have Office 97 on her system if it weren't for the 800
>pound gorilla that she lives with"
>
>David Rollo wrote:
>>
>> Patrick Henebry wrote
>>
>> >I'm not sure about the second problem but the first error message sounds
>> >like messages I get if something I've installed replaces the infamous
>> >mfc42.dll file with an older version. NS should have the 990k file.
...
>> ==========
>>
>> Can you be a bit more specific about the 'optimal' version of mfc42.dll?
>> eg I have one of 919K, dated 7/7/97 10.22.
>> Any one of a dozen programs could have installed it, but NS seems to live
>> with it OK
>>
>> David Rollo
>
- Next message: CHRISTOPHER D MONTESI: "Re: subscribe"
- Previous message: Patrick Henebry: "Re: error message in NS"
- Maybe in reply to: Mike Baehr: "error message in NS"
 |  |