- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Holland St.John: "Re: active noise cancellation"
- Previous message: Don Colton: "active noise cancellation"
- In reply to: Don Colton: "active noise cancellation"
- Next in thread: Holland St.John: "Re: active noise cancellation"
cancellation of the type you described. I have an ANC 600, which is
very good, and stays in position much better than their earlier
models. It also has a very thick, very flexible boom which is a piece
of cake to maneuver. I dare say that if I had had this microphone
when I started out a couple of years ago with the Andreas, I would
never have tried something else. The earlier models were flimsy and
hard to keep in the same spot in relation to your mouth.
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:23:44 -1000, you wrote:
>Much of the noise that occurs in my office is computer fan noise. At
>least that is what I notice most. I know there is noise from the
>fluorescent lights and from the CRT as well, althought I expect there
>is a dropout in my hearing at that frequency now. Anyway, ...
>
>I am wondering about the computer fan noise. Has anyone investigated
>active noice cancellation for computer fans? Active cancellation is
>the playing of exactly opposite sounds to cancel out the undesired
>sounds.
>
>Or is the software (I am running NatSpeak 1.0) smart enough to do
>spectral subtraction anyway, so active cancellation would not really
>buy anything?
>
>Don
>
SF/Dictated using ViaVoice Gold speech recognition software. Please forgive "typos."
- Next message: Holland St.John: "Re: active noise cancellation"
- Previous message: Don Colton: "active noise cancellation"
- In reply to: Don Colton: "active noise cancellation"
- Next in thread: Holland St.John: "Re: active noise cancellation"
 |  |