- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Daft, Christopher M: "RE: Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)"
- Previous message: Blair, David, Ph.D: "RE: TX chipset and voice applications"
Thanks,
Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: LVASoftnet [SMTP:LVASoftnet@@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 1998 12:31 PM
To: voice-users@@voicerecognition.com
Subject: Re: Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)
One person last week noted DragonDictate performed more slowly on a PentiumPro
-- not a Pentium II. Correspondence with that person discovered that the
person went from a M-APCA card to an on-board sound card; a very likely cause
for the slowdown. My own experience with clients is that Pentium-II systems
make DragonDictate look very good.
Regards,
Larry Allen
Softnet Systems, Inc.
In a message dated 98-01-05 13:16:33 EST, jamie@@decisionism.com writes:
> Subj: Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)
> Date: 98-01-05 13:16:33 EST
> From: jamie@@decisionism.com (Jamie Ferguson)
> Sender: voice-users-owner@@voicerecognition.com
> To: epstein@@gold.nlm.nih.gov ('Jonathan Epstein'), voice-users@
> voicerecognition.com (voice-users@@voicerecognition.com)
>
> I thought somebody wrote in to this list last week stating that
> DragonDictate performed very slowly with a Pentium II because DragonDictate
> still contains some 16-bit code. Is performance really that different?
>
> Jamie
- Next message: Daft, Christopher M: "RE: Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)"
- Previous message: Blair, David, Ph.D: "RE: TX chipset and voice applications"
 |  |