----------
From: epstein@@gold.nlm.nih.gov [SMTP:epstein@gold.nlm.nih.gov]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 1998 3:36 PM
To: Brooks@@concentric.net; owner-voice-users@shell.flinet.com;
voice-users@@voicerecognition.com; G.Wexler@open.ac.uk; dlavetts@whc.net
Subject: Re: TX chipset and voice applications
It would not affect your performance if you don't plan to use
more
(specifically, to _install_) more than 64MB of RAM. However,
these seems
to be an unwelcome constraint, given how memory-hungry these
Speech Recog.
programs are.
- Jonathan
> From dlavetts@@WHC.NET Mon Jan 5 15:32:33 1998
> X-Sender: dlavetts@@whc.net
> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 13:29:08 -0700
> To: epstein@@gold.nlm.nih.gov (Jonathan Epstein),
Brooks@@concentric.net,
owner-voice-users@@shell.flinet.com,
voice-users@@voicerecognition.com,
G.Wexler@@open.ac.uk
> From: David Lavetts <dlavetts@@WHC.NET>
> Subject: Re: TX chipset and voice applications
> Mime-Version: 1.0
>
> Why would it effect performance if you don't plan to use more
than 64 meg
> of ram?
>
> At 12:00 PM 1/5/1998 -0500, you wrote:
> >Personally I would not buy an old-style Pentium system with
the 64 MB
> caching
> >problem. From what I read, it is unlikely to severely impact
your
> performance,
> >but it will affect it somewhat.
> At 12:00 PM 1/5/1998 -0500, Jonathan Epstein wrote:
> >Personally I would not buy an old-style Pentium system with
the 64 MB
> caching
> >problem. From what I read, it is unlikely to severely impact
your
> performance,
> >but it will affect it somewhat.
>
> David Lavetts
![]() |