- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: George Tracy: "Re: TX chipset and voice applications"
- Previous message: Holland St. John: "Re: upgrade to NaturallySpeaking?"
- Maybe in reply to: Jamie Ferguson: "Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)"
- Next in thread: Rose: "Re: Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)"
-- not a Pentium II. Correspondence with that person discovered that the
person went from a M-APCA card to an on-board sound card; a very likely cause
for the slowdown. My own experience with clients is that Pentium-II systems
make DragonDictate look very good.
Regards,
Larry Allen
Softnet Systems, Inc.
In a message dated 98-01-05 13:16:33 EST, jamie@@decisionism.com writes:
> Subj: Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)
> Date: 98-01-05 13:16:33 EST
> From: jamie@@decisionism.com (Jamie Ferguson)
> Sender: voice-users-owner@@voicerecognition.com
> To: epstein@@gold.nlm.nih.gov ('Jonathan Epstein'), voice-users@
> voicerecognition.com (voice-users@@voicerecognition.com)
>
> I thought somebody wrote in to this list last week stating that
> DragonDictate performed very slowly with a Pentium II because DragonDictate
> still contains some 16-bit code. Is performance really that different?
>
> Jamie
- Next message: George Tracy: "Re: TX chipset and voice applications"
- Previous message: Holland St. John: "Re: upgrade to NaturallySpeaking?"
- Maybe in reply to: Jamie Ferguson: "Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)"
- Next in thread: Rose: "Re: Performance (was RE: TX chipset and voice applications)"
 |  |